https://doi.org/10.25678/00037X

Data for: Predictive models using “cheap and easy” field measurements: Can they fill a gap in planning, monitoring, and implementing fecal sludge management solutions?

The characteristics of fecal sludge delivered to treatment plants are highly variable. Adapting treatment process operations accordingly is challenging due to a lack of analytical capacity for characterization and monitoring at many treatment plants. Cost-efficient and simple field measurements such as photographs and probe readings could be proxies for process control parameters that normally require laboratory analysis. To investigate this, we evaluated questionnaire data, expert assessments, and simple analytical measurements for fecal sludge collected from 421 onsite containments. This data served as inputs to models of varying complexity. Random forest and linear regression models were able to predict physical-chemical characteristics including total solids (TS) and ammonium (NH4+-N) concentrations, and solid-liquid separation performance including settling efficiency and filtration time (R2 from 0.51-0.66) based on image analysis of photographs (sludge color, supernatant color, and texture) and probe readings (conductivity (EC) and pH). Supernatant color was the best predictor of settling efficiency and filtration time, EC was the best predictor of NH4+-N, and texture was the best predictor of TS. Predictive models have the potential to be applied for real-time monitoring and process control if a database of measurements is developed and models are validated in other cities. Simple decision tree models based on the single classifier of containment type can also be used to make predictions about citywide planning, where a lower degree of accuracy is required.

Data and Resources

Citation

This Data Package

Ward, B. J., Andriessen, N., Tembo, J. M., Kabika, J., Grau, M., Scheidegger, A., et al. (2021). Data for: Predictive models using “cheap and easy” field measurements: Can they fill a gap in planning, monitoring, and implementing fecal sludge management solutions? (Version 1.0) [Data set]. Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.25678/00037X

The associated article

Ward, B. J., Andriessen, N., Tembo, J. M., Kabika, J., Grau, M., Scheidegger, A., et al. (2021). Predictive models using “cheap and easy” field measurements: Can they fill a gap in planning, monitoring, and implementing fecal sludge management solutions? Water Research, 116997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.116997

Metadata

Open Data Open Data
Author
  • Ward, Barbara Jeanne
  • Andriessen, Nienke
  • Tembo, James M.
  • Kabika, Joel
  • Grau, Matt
  • Scheidegger, Andreas
  • Morgenroth, Eberhard
  • Strande, Linda
Keywords fecal sludge,WASH,sanitation,image analysis,machine learning,random forest,toilet type
Variables
  • ammonium-nitrogen
  • capillary_suction_time
  • chemical_oxygen_demand
  • color
  • electric_conductivity
  • odor
  • pH
  • texture
  • total_kjeldahl_nitrogen
  • total_organic_carbon
  • total_solids
  • total_solids_after_dewatering
  • turbidity
  • volatile_solids
Systems
  • laboratory
  • metropolitan area
  • onsite sanitation containments
Timerange
  • 2019-09 TO 2019-12
Geographic Name(s)
  • Lusaka, Zambia
Review Level domain specific
Curator Ward, Barbara Jeanne
Contact barbarajeanne.ward@eawag.ch
DOI 10.25678/00037X